Change could be led by current leaders who are inspired by
new ideas (which may come from someone or something else) or who realize (or
are shown) that the current direction or the existing state of things just is
not right or is not working.
I think it is somewhat disingenuous to assert that the
situation can change but those who are leading the situation cannot. To suggest
that change only comes through revolution (replacing current leadership with
new and different leaders) does not allow for the Eureka! moments or the
"oh, my God, what have I done?" moments. We have plenty of evidence
historically of leaders changing their politics, position, beliefs and so
forth, and in many cases that is exactly what makes them leaders, as opposed to
those who are intransigent or stubborn and go down with the ship instead of
finding a new way to save it.
And there are plenty of examples of leadership changing, but
nothing else does.
No comments:
Post a Comment